Family Planning, Maternal and Reproductive HealthPro-natalist policies have been considered at various times by many developed countries especially in fertility troughs of the 1930s and 1970s facing below.of pro-natalist population policy representing the attempts to enhance the fertility rates in the population as a whole or in some of its groups. And if sustained growth instead of ageing per se was the preoccupation of policy makers, then the priority should be technological progress as a major source of economic growth. More generally, a pro-natalist policy does not make economic sense in the face of low labour participation rates, a high pool of unskilled labour, and high unemployment.
Distilling Research for Non-Technical Audiences Adaptive Learning and Knowledge Management Census and the American Community Survey Social and Environmental Dimensions of Health The first, in 199697 under the Fujimori government, was a demographic. In this paper we look at the form pro-natalist population policy agendaIt has been overshadowed by two periods of anti-choice policies and interventions.
National Center for Health Statistics.In a population engineering effort unprecedented in North America, the Quebec government in 1988 implemented three programs to boost fertility: allowances for newborns that, after amendments, paid women C$500 for a first birth, C$1,000 for a second, and C$8,000 for a third and each subsequent birth (one Canadian dollar equals 63 U.S. Since then, two kinds of government intervention to make parenthood more attractive have been tried, but experience has shown that pronatalism is no longer the means to ensure a (distinctive) francophone Quebec.Total Fertility Rates for Quebec, Canada, and the United States, 1931-1993Sources: Statistics Canada and the U.S. As the figure below shows, however, between 19, Quebec’s fertility rate plummeted. The province’s political elite and its clergy successfully promoted relatively high fertility rates to overcome subordination to English-Canada. Policy and Advocacy Communications Training(December 2001) For centuries, fertility was seen as central to the survival of Quebec’s distinct French-Canadian culture.
Pro Natalist Population Policy Free Loan To
Some even charged that the pronatalists had invented a fertility crisis to advance the nationalist agenda. Noninterventionists argued that fertility decisions were individual, not governmental, responsibilities. Overall, Quebec families received almost C$4 billion annually in direct and income tax assistance from the provincial and federal governments.Reactions to these forms of direct financial assistance varied. Families with two or more children under age 18 qualified for a C$7,000 interest-free loan to help purchase a first home.
Establish a standard child allowance program for low-income families, wherein the amount of allowances would depend on the number of dependent children under age 18, on family type (single-parent, two-parent), and on income (a threshold of C$15,332 for single-parent families C$21,825 for two-parent families). It created the Ministry of Family and Children’s Services and gave it a budget of C$500 million. Overall, policies favoring third and subsequent children were viewed increasingly as contrary to the needs of most families.In 1997 Quebec switched its approach to strengthening families. Although there was an initial increase in the late 1980s in the total fertility rate from 1.49 children per woman in 1988 to 1.72 in 1990, after 1990 total births decreased, and families with three or more children remained uncommon. Of particular importance were policies to decrease tensions between employment and family responsibilities.These critiques coincided with a growing awareness that Quebec’s incentive policies were not producing the expected birth increases.
Ten innovative pilot projects have also recently been launched that offer evening and 24-hour day-care service, seven days a week.)But even the new family assistance policies have shortcomings. (Presently, Quebec is the only province to have universal subsidized day care. Provide a network of government-regulated, highly subsidized (C$5 per day) day-care facilities offering a quality educational program to children from birth to kindergarten age.
Like many other modern societies, Quebec faces a low birth rate and an aging population. Consequently, Quebec day-care centers now have long waiting lists and one of the highest ratios of children to day-care workers in Canada.Although the new policies promote work, they inadvertently limit women’s choices by offering more assistance to families with employed mothers than to families with stay-at-home mothers (through universal C$5-a-day day care and through cutbacks in social assistance).Clearly, promoting higher fertility has not been effective for the past half-century. And due to budget constraints, the parental leave plan has yet to be realized.In terms of the universal C$5-a-day day-care program, there are not enough regulated day-care spaces to keep up with demand. (Canada offers both family assistance, supporting the needs of children and adults within families, and social assistance, which spans health, employment, and general social welfare.) Families with a net income of C$25,000 or higher now receive less family assistance the money once spent on them is now allocated to low-income working families. Families with a net income of less than C$10,000 benefit only marginally, since their increase in family assistance is offset by a reduction of a similar amount in social assistance.
Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Research Branch.Baril, Robert, Pierre Lefebvre, and Philip Merrigan. “Family Policy in Quebec.” Background Paper. “Family and Population Policy in Québec: Implications for Women.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/ Revue Femmes et Droit 7:116-132.Baker, Maureen. The Quebec government has found and will continue to find other means to protect the distinctiveness of its society, including reassessing family assistance programs.Catherine Krull is a professor of sociology at Queens University in Kingston, Ontario.Baker, Maureen.
La fin de la revanche des berceaux. “Pro-natalism, Feminism, and Nationalism.” In Francois-Pierre Gingras (ed.) Gender and Politics in Contemporary Canada, Toronto: Oxford University Press, 135-152.Henripin, Jacques and Evelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk. Whitehead (eds.) Population Issues in Canada.Hamilton, Roberta. “The Fertility Crises in Quebec.” Translated by Katya von Knorring. “Family Ministry Draws Fire.” The Montreal Gazette, May 14, 1997: A9.Council on French Life in America. “The Quebec Question: A Matter of Population.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 12:16-41.Clark, Campbell.
Axes et Enjeux de la Politique Familiale Québécoise: Présentation d’Une Recension Informatisée des Écrits. Quebec Pension Board.Saint-Pierre, Marie Hélène et Renée B.-Dandurand. Les allocations d’aide aux familles: Statistiques 1994. Montréal: Boréal Express.Regie des rentes du Québec, 1994. Le choc démographique: le déclin du Québec est-il inévitable.
“The Development of Family Policy: A Comparison of Family Benefits and Tax Reductions for Families in 18 OECD Countries.” Acta Sociologica 35: 201-217. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, Trade and Technology (Cat. Selected Birth and Fertility Statistics, Canada, 1921-1990.
0 kommentar(er)
